As Pach mentioned, if you remove politics out of the picture, Science and Religion do not contradict each other because in the first place, they are not in the same spectrum. You cannot compare Apples with Oranges. Only when politics enter do people compare apples with oranges.
However, they both provide theories not only on origin of existence, but they argue that biogenesis is more likely than abiogenesis. Your position right now if I am not mistaken is on abiogenesis, which is what some, if not most of the scientific community attributes where the evidence points.
I wonder if we can replace God with Allah and Bibble with the Q'uran. Would there still be an "scientific argument" or people will just say that "they are two different things not to be compared".
You can feel free to fill it in with any mythological god in the span of the history of religion ( Zeus, Mithra, Apollo, Quetzalcoatl, Odin, Yahweh, Jehovah etc etc) The point is that, a complex creation is created by something just as complicated if not more complicated than the creation.
So following this logic, if we assume that God is real, and God created humans that are complicated beings, the logical regression step means that God itself is just as or even more complicated than humans. Then you take another logical regressive step, whatever created God, has to be more complicated and sophisticated than God. Another step and another, you will end up with an infinite regress and answer nothing.
This is what really makes me laugh, people are intelligent beings, we base our lives on everyday decisions based on experience, knowledge, critical thinking and risk assessment, yet some people have this special area in their brain, let's say the "God box" where all of those attributes do not apply.
The funny thing about people, those who are not really doing ACTUAL researches tend to be the one who compares religion and science; while the real scientists do not. Enter politics! 
Einstein and Galileo were deeply attached to their faith(minus church politics) yet they are among the world's greatest scientists
Politics are irrelevant when you are trying to prove the facts. The simple fact is that there are two clashing theories to try and answer the history of existence and development of living creatures. You can read and try to follow the scientific method and the logic to answer each claim.
There will come a time when, just like all other religion, the major ones right now will be thrown out to the garbage of human history, just take a look at Thor after explaining the reason on how we get lightning and thunder, people stopped believing in that myth. Some scientists like Isaac Newton who explained the theory of gravity couldnt explain where gravity came from. So being a religious person, he thought it came from God because he had no better explanation. Now we have the most recent theory for gravity coming from Albert Einstein.
What if in the future the Multiverse theory is validated? or the Big Bang Theory? String theory? Are you going to discard your faith once the facts come out? I highly doubt it (see my statement about the "God box" above)
After all, scientific RACISM did exist where scientists used to believe that a certain race was more intelligent that another race and it took the charity of religion to help remove it(after all, where did the statement "we are all created equal come from? Definitely not from science!). Again, in the 1950's and 1960's some scientists believed that LGM - Little Green Men existed (which turned out to be pulsar stars and the one who came up with the idea of pulsar stars was RIDICULED by "fellow scientists" who believed in the LGMs).
And where is this theory now after scientific method and formal peer reviews are applied? Can you cite your resources for the first few sentences about the superiority of another race and with the charity of religion it was abolished?
One thing: I don't think you got my dust statement. Lighten up a bit and you will get it. Get rid of your religious bigotry and you will clearly see BOTH sides of the spectrum.
I think it is on both sides, you missed the point on the idea of infinite regress. Try to answer that and instead of referring my statements as sign of religious bigotry. If you start to add God into the equation, you will now have to provide evidence of such an existence.
